Clear answers before you invest in technology.

Mainly SMEs and established companies that need to sell better, save time, connect information or gain control. We work on both customer-facing digital channels and internal processes.

No. We start with what is happening, its impact and the outcome you need. Only then do we determine whether to configure a tool, integrate systems, automate a process or build something custom.

It depends on scope, functionality, content, integrations and support. A landing page, a store connected to inventory and a management system are not comparable. After the first conversation, we define deliverables, dependencies and first-party or third-party costs before presenting a proposal.

Timing changes with scope and dependencies. We propose stages and verifiable deliveries so validation does not wait until the end. The proposal includes an estimated schedule and the information or materials we need from your company.

No. We are based in Guaymallén, Mendoza, and work with companies throughout Argentina. We can meet in person in Mendoza and run projects remotely elsewhere in the country.

Depending on scope, it may include discovery, content architecture, UX/UI, responsive development, technical SEO, analytics, forms, WhatsApp and connections with other tools. Every proposal states what is included so you do not compare offers that deliver different things.

A landing page supports one offer or campaign; a corporate website explains the company, its services and proof; an online store adds a catalogue, payments and order management. The right choice depends on the customer's real journey and what your team must do after each enquiry or sale.

They can be part of the service or managed separately, depending on the project. The proposal identifies renewals and third-party costs. We recommend keeping the domain and critical accounts registered to the company.

Yes, but it requires a planned migration. Before launch, we inventory URLs, content, metadata, links, analytics and pages already receiving search traffic. We then configure redirects and checks to reduce avoidable traffic loss.

Yes, when the platforms provide an API, webhooks or another reliable exchange method. We can synchronize products, prices, inventory, customers or orders to prevent duplicate entry. First we validate the source of truth, exceptions and required controls.

It includes a technical foundation designed to be crawlable, understandable and fast. That is not the same as ongoing SEO: competing for searches may also require research, content, authority, local SEO and measurement. The scope states which initial and recurring work is included.

There is no universal timeline. It depends on the starting point, competition, domain authority, technical issues and content quality. We measure early signals such as indexing and impressions, plus business outcomes such as qualified enquiries; we do not set a date before analysing those factors.

No, and you should be cautious of anyone who does. No agency controls the algorithm, competitors or demand. We can commit to a sound strategy and implementation, transparent measurement and improvements based on evidence.

SEO improves organic visibility; SEM usually refers to paid search advertising. AEO and GEO are names used for visibility in answer engines and generative AI experiences. In practice they share the same foundation: useful content, clear technical structure, authority and a company that is consistently identified across the web.

No tag or file can guarantee a mention. We work to make your information public, crawlable, clear, consistent and backed by real experience. Structured data helps describe content, but it does not replace a trusted brand, strong pages and first-hand evidence.

A standard product is better when it solves the process well and can be configured without forcing the team to work around it. Custom development makes sense when a critical gap remains, the process is a differentiator or deep integration is required. We recommend the simplest option that solves the problem.

Only when there is a clear reason. Our priority is to preserve what works, connect what is separated, automate repetitive work and build only what is missing. Replacing everything increases cost, risk and adoption time.

Repetitive, frequent and measurable work: data entry, reminders, enquiry classification, reports or movements between systems. First we record the time they consume, the errors they generate and the exceptions that need human intervention.

Yes, when the tools allow secure access to their data or actions. We use APIs, webhooks, connectors or custom development. Feasibility is confirmed before quoting because some providers limit permissions, volume or functionality.

Yes. It is our preferred approach when uncertainty is high. We choose one bottleneck, define a baseline metric, implement the first improvement and verify the result before expanding.

It can assist with enquiry classification, document search, response drafts, data extraction and repetitive tasks with clear rules. Not every task needs AI: when traditional automation is more predictable and economical, it is usually the better decision.

It should not replace human judgment. It can answer repeated questions, collect information and route each case to the right person. We design limits and escalation so complaints, exceptions and sensitive decisions remain with the team.

We define approved sources, permissions, allowed actions, activity logs and cases requiring human review. Before using sensitive information, we assess providers, storage and exposure. Specific safeguards depend on risk and are included in the technical scope.

We recommend that the domain, analytics and critical accounts remain registered to the company. The proposal should document access, deliverables, third-party services and responsibilities so the operation does not depend on one person.

Yes. We support the launch and can continue with maintenance, support and iterative improvements. The model, response times and coverage are agreed according to how critical the solution is.

Yes. It helps us understand the context, determine whether we can help and propose a next step. You do not need a technical specification: explaining what happens today and its impact is enough.